<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confessions of a Cranky Lit-Mag Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/</link>
	<description>Writing about writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:58:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beggard Presley</title>
		<link>http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-240799</link>
		<dc:creator>Beggard Presley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/#comment-240799</guid>
		<description>Bah, who gives a shit at the end of the day anyway?  Slush pile or not -- the average lit mag has a couple hundred readers, who promptly forget  the contents of the previous issue as soon as the next one arrives in the mail.  What names do I recognise?  Why isn&#039;t mine there more often?  Blah, blah, the evening dinner version of &#039;literature&#039;.  Believe you me, it&#039;s forgetabilia in its most obstinate claims to art.  Well, it does give a little peep show thrill, I guess.

When it comes to stuff that stand the test of time . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah, who gives a shit at the end of the day anyway?  Slush pile or not &#8212; the average lit mag has a couple hundred readers, who promptly forget  the contents of the previous issue as soon as the next one arrives in the mail.  What names do I recognise?  Why isn&#8217;t mine there more often?  Blah, blah, the evening dinner version of &#8216;literature&#8217;.  Believe you me, it&#8217;s forgetabilia in its most obstinate claims to art.  Well, it does give a little peep show thrill, I guess.</p>
<p>When it comes to stuff that stand the test of time . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni D.</title>
		<link>http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-227475</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/#comment-227475</guid>
		<description>Gee, Phil, I guess the point is that even journal editors have only a finite amount of time available for reading manuscripts, and therefore can&#039;t afford to read every word sent to them, including piles of ...slush.  Instead of getting so worked-up about this inevitable state of affairs, which has (from the sounds of it) kept some of your own &quot;soaring masterpieces&quot; from seeing the light of day, perhaps you ought to take a hard look at your own opening gambits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, Phil, I guess the point is that even journal editors have only a finite amount of time available for reading manuscripts, and therefore can&#8217;t afford to read every word sent to them, including piles of &#8230;slush.  Instead of getting so worked-up about this inevitable state of affairs, which has (from the sounds of it) kept some of your own &#8220;soaring masterpieces&#8221; from seeing the light of day, perhaps you ought to take a hard look at your own opening gambits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-18083</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/#comment-18083</guid>
		<description>bullshit.  

if this idiot equates an opening line with a soaring masterpiece, why should i bother with him?  please let me know what publications he edits so i never send anything out in his direction.  

its disheartening to see that an opening line means more than a literary payoff, but i guess these are busy people, and can&#039;t be expected to have time to.....read....

anyone else see a problem with this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bullshit.  </p>
<p>if this idiot equates an opening line with a soaring masterpiece, why should i bother with him?  please let me know what publications he edits so i never send anything out in his direction.  </p>
<p>its disheartening to see that an opening line means more than a literary payoff, but i guess these are busy people, and can&#8217;t be expected to have time to&#8230;..read&#8230;.</p>
<p>anyone else see a problem with this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Volponi</title>
		<link>http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-16294</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Volponi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.slushpile.net/index.php/2006/06/12/confessions-of-a-cranky-lit-mag-editor/#comment-16294</guid>
		<description>I agree with his fire in the first sentence- but I think it needs to go deeper than that.  I worked a lot with kids who didn’t want to read, in places like Rikers Island and drug rehab centers.  I’d copy the best scene in a classic novel and slap it on the front cover to spark interest in these reluctant readers.  Sometimes it worked, too.  So when I started to write some fiction myself, I’d try to open with the best scene in the book, or at least something real compelling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with his fire in the first sentence- but I think it needs to go deeper than that.  I worked a lot with kids who didn’t want to read, in places like Rikers Island and drug rehab centers.  I’d copy the best scene in a classic novel and slap it on the front cover to spark interest in these reluctant readers.  Sometimes it worked, too.  So when I started to write some fiction myself, I’d try to open with the best scene in the book, or at least something real compelling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

