March 10, 2010


Wallace Archives Sold

Posted on Wednesday 10 March 2010

The Daily Texan is reporting that Harry Ransom Center acquired David Foster Wallace’s archive.

scott @ 12:24 pm
Filed under: News

March 8, 2010


Tracking What Works and What Doesn’t

Posted on Monday 8 March 2010

So much of publishing success remains a mystery. Huge marketing budgets don’t ensure success, as Charles Frazier found out with the infamous release of Thirteen Moons failed to capitalize on the success of his earlier work Cold Mountain. And while everyone may jump on book trailers or Twitter pages or whatever the latest thing is, the fact is that hard facts are hard to come by.

Which is why I enjoy J.A. Konrath’s blog A Newbie’s Guide to Publishing so much. On this educational site, Konrath reports, in great detail, on what works for him when it comes to selling books. He’s not bashful about sharing financial specifics or other data. He lays it all out there so you can learn from his experiences.

If you’ve never visited the site before, it can admittedly be a bit overwhelming. Konrath’s blog posts are long and detailed. So don’t expect a quick read while you gulp down your coffee before dashing out in the morning. But if you want to invest the time to truly learn how to market your books and writing, then the blog is well worth it.

If you’re a newcomer to the site, Konrath posted a sort of summation of everything he’s learned about publishing as a sort of introduction. Check out interesting article“>the post “What I Know” here. I don’t always agree with absolutely everything Konrath advises, but I do appreciate the specific ways he tracks what has worked in his career and what has not paid off. As you build your own writing career, I encourage you to do the same so you can learn from your mistakes, build upon your successes, and launch a longterm and fulfilling career.

And be sure to try out what Konrath says…

scott @ 4:00 pm
Filed under: General

March 5, 2010


Tributes to Captain Maximus

Posted on Friday 5 March 2010

HannahAs the week has progressed, there have been more and more tributes to Barry Hannah posted around the web. Meanwhile, I’m not sure I’m any closer to summing up my feelings on the late writer and mentor than I was when I first heard the news of his passing.

I met Barry Hannah in the spring of my freshman year. He allowed me to sign up for his graduate level workshop based solely on the fact that he liked the old sixties tune, “If You’re Going to San Francisco” by a singer who shared my name. I sat down in his writing workshop, surrounded by people older — and far more experienced — than me. I was nervous enough and Hannah stormed into the classroom in a whirlwind and said “goddamn” within the first five minutes. I believe it was the first time I’d ever heard an educator curse.

My stories that semester were roundly thrashed. Hannah didn’t like them and my classmates didn’t either. Looking back, they were undoubtedly correct in their assessments. I was clueless and fumbling around. And Hannah didn’t go out of his way to spare any of my feelings, a characteristic that I later admired. I still have almost all of the manuscripts he marked up over the years. Those early papers contain many criticisms that all beginning writing students receive:

“Too much editorial comment. Just tell the story & show.”
“Okay: but best just show the view, no interpolation.”

Other comments were more direct and harsh:

“Just a summary case history. All the good — truly human stuff left out.”
“Dull.”
“What? What?”
“God, how awful.”

During those first semesters in Bondurant Hall, sitting through Tuesday afternoons as the sun went down, I was terrified of Hannah. I literally had nightmares about him. I was thoroughly confused about fiction and I kept wondering how a man who wrote about a walrus leaping out of the ocean to rape a woman could consistently read my work and state, “I just don’t believe this could happen.”

But I stubbornly refused to go away. I signed up for more and more writing workshops. And Hannah stubbornly refused to give up on me. He marked up my stories even when during those rare semesters when I wasn’t in his workshop. I hung out in his office, choking on his cigarette smoke, as he told stories and gave me reading lists of authors I should check out. I once became very ill, a mixture of flu viruses and exhaustion from working too much, and missed several weeks of class. I wasn’t in his workshop at the time, but he heard about my illness and called to check on me.

Over the years, his comments on my stories got better. I hung on those words of praise and studied the criticisms. Finally, one day he wrote on one of my stories:

“This catches a world and holds it beautifully. Save this for the future. It’ll go in a nice collection of McKenzie. Shows real hope. I’m proud of you.”

I think, in some selfish way, the combination of Barry Hannah and pride in conjunction with my writing is one of the many things about his passing that upsets me. I realize how egotistical that sounds given the grief that his wife Susan and the family must feel. But for years, Hannah served as sort of a northstar or a compass to my own writing. Although I’ve branched off into different directions in my writing career, I always looked forward to sitting down with him on the porch and handing him a copy of my first published book. That moment, hokey and cliche as it might be, was one of the images that kept me sending out stories and proposals, even as hundreds of rejections piled up.

My first book comes out in August. And while it’s far below even Hannah’s worst scribblings, I still looked forward to chatting with him about it. I anticipated his criticisms and what I could learn from them and I yearned for his compliments. I figured he would probably be rough on it, like he was my first stories. But that I could gain more praise from him with each successive book, as I did in class.

Barry Hannah’s passing also represents an end of an era in my mind. The Oxford, Mississippi that I knew — and aspired to — is gone. Over the years, after finishing my master’s degree, I haven’t been back to town much. Part of that was because of work and schedules and all the usual obstacles of life. But part of that absence was because I wanted to delay my return until I could come back and have something to show for my writing career, at least some small accomplishment.

I went to Ole Miss and progressed through the writing workshop in the nineties. So many of my idols are gone now. John Grisham spends most of his time in Virginia, Cynthia Shearer moved away, Larry Brown died suddenly in 2004, the Oxford American magazine relocated, and now Barry Hannah is gone. Some of those folks I considered friends, others were mentors and role models to me even if they didn’t know it.

There are still damn good writers and great friends in Oxford, all is not lost. But it’s a very different place now. And at least for the past few days, since reading the news in the Oxford Eagle it has seemed very empty in my mind.

There’s no real conclusion to this piece, since it’s really just a rambling of thoughts as I try to process Barry Hannah’s passing. Other people have been much more coherent and eloquent in their tributes to the late author. I encourage you to check out the links below:

New York Times obituary.

Article about Hannah’s influence on Mississippi College, and vice versa.

NPR article and radio interview with Hannah.

Richard Howorth’s remembrance in Time magazine.

Literary Mourning in The New York Times.

scott @ 12:12 pm
Filed under: General

March 3, 2010


Lish Collection Sold

Posted on Wednesday 3 March 2010

Gordon Lish

Publishers Marketplace is reporting that the first complete collection of short work by Gordon Lish has sold to Or Books. It’ll be interesting for people to check out Captain Fiction’s own work, given the attention he’s received lately for shaping Raymond Carver’s stories.

scott @ 2:37 pm
Filed under: News

March 1, 2010


Reports that Barry Hannah Passed Away

Posted on Monday 1 March 2010

hannah 2.jpg

The Oxford Eagle in Oxford, Mississippi is reporting that Barry Hannah passed away today. This is just days before this weekend’s Oxford Conference for the Book dedicated to scholarly discussions and celebrations of Barry’s work.

It looks like details are still somewhat sketchy. I’m making some calls to try and find out more. There’s a part of me that’s hoping this is some sort of mistake, or a bad hacker prank, or something since there isn’t any reference to this elsewhere in other news sources.

I can’t even begin to process this. I was blessed enough to study with Barry for almost five years as I worked my way through undergrad and graduate school and I’m at a loss for words.

Sad, sad news. I’ll try to get it together by tomorrow to have something coherent to say.

UPDATES:
The Clarion Ledger in Jackson, MS is reporting that that the cause of death was an “apparent heart attack.”

scott @ 10:25 pm
Filed under: News

February 24, 2010


Ten Rules for Writing

Posted on Wednesday 24 February 2010

tablets

The Guardian in Great Britain approached a number of writers, such as Elmore Leonard, Annie Proulx, Ian Rankin, and Zadie Smith, to get ten rules of writing fiction from each. They have some interesting advice and certainly there’s something in there each of us can learn from. Check it out here.

A couple of writers advised that you can’t get any serious writing done on a computer that is connected to the internet. That’s something I’ve been thinking of doing: just unplugging for a few hours a day. Anyone else achieve good results with this strategy?

scott @ 3:13 pm
Filed under: Writing Tips

February 23, 2010


Twelve Hawks Television Rights Sold to Fox

Posted on Tuesday 23 February 2010

traveler

Secretive author John Twelve Hawks has sold the television rights to his Fourth Realm Trilogy to Fox, according to Reuters. No word yet on if the shows writers will have to adopt Twelve Hawks’s habit of using voice scramblers on phone calls.

scott @ 11:10 am
Filed under: News

February 22, 2010


The Science of Tone

Posted on Monday 22 February 2010

premier guitar cover

Most of you certainly know that my love of guitars rivals my obsession with books. I got an opportunity to explore that love a bit recently for Premier Guitar magazine. The cool folks over there asked me to write an article on the science of tone.

Which turned out to be quite a challenge. Like evaluating books, there is no objective measurement for what is “good” or “bad” in terms of guitar tones. It really is all up to the listener. Sure, there are certain standards and accepted principles, just like we have in literature. But there’s no perfect formula or recipe that says, “This much distortion plus that much sustain, cut with this amount of feedback will sound good.” So the article turned out to pose a question that can’t be answered, but is very fun to discuss nonetheless.

So if you’re into rocking, be sure to check out the piece. And peruse the rest of Premier Guitar as well. I’m really impressed by the staff over there and how they take chances and do things a little bit differently than so many of the guitar mags.

scott @ 4:50 pm
Filed under: News

January 18, 2010


WSJ Discovers the Difficulties of Unrepresented Writers

Posted on Monday 18 January 2010

On Friday, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “The Death of the Slush Pile.” It’s a perfectly acceptable article but what interests me is how completely not-news this thing is. I realize that WSJ readers are not writers and are probably not familiar with publishing.

But still, can anyone be surprised by the fact that it’s hard for unrepresented, unknown writers to get their work read? Even for the casual reader of the New York Times with the regular “death of publishing” articles should know about the situation. And to trot out the age old examples of Harry Potter’s rejections, etc, just adds to the not-news aspects.

What next? An article on “Few Musicians Ever Sell Out Stadium Tours” or “It’s Hard to Reach George Clooney Status if You’re an Actor.” I don’t work on music or in Hollywood, yet I know that those things are incredibly difficult to accomplish. I would have thought the same thing about non-writers understanding that it’s almost impossible to get a book published if you’re just sending manuscripts around blindly.

Having said all that, the article itself is fine. I’m just curious as to how the assignment came about? What made a WSJ editor exclaim, “We have to report on the difficulty of getting published now!”

scott @ 9:39 am
Filed under: General

January 11, 2010


The Simpsons 20th Anniversary Show and the Book They Didn’t Use

Posted on Monday 11 January 2010

ortved simpsons

Last night on Fox, I caught Morgan Spurlock’s documentary about the 20 year history of The Simpsons. It was entertaining enough and I was particularly pleased to observe a situation where vocalist Sting references literary heavyweight Cormac McCarthy while discussing yellowish cartoon characters.

But during the show, I kept thinking about how much of a shame it was that the documentary couldn’t somehow involve John Ortved.

A writer for Vanity Fair, Ortved published the highly entertaining and informative The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History. In the book, Ortved reveals much of the behind-the-scenes politics and powergrabs amongst producers and writers that marred the years in Springfield. It’s a fun book.

It’s also a book that at least some of the Fox people wanted no part of. Ortved discussed some of the difficulties in getting quotes in this December Village Voice article.

In spite of the challenges, Ortved wrote a good book that covered much of the same ground as Spurlock’s documentary last night. It’s just a shame the book couldn’t be used somehow, although not surprising given the negative reaction from the cartoon’s brass.

scott @ 4:41 pm
Filed under: General